Monday, January 09, 2006

Predictions for 2006

By Micah Holmquist

Read full article...

Posted 01/09 | Add a Comment

    Comments:

    You must register to comment.

    Login | Register

  1. Micah, I agree with your predictions.

    Here are a couple of mine.
    If at some time in the distant future, Iraq ever does become a Democracy, the USA will destroy it just as it did in Iran. Democracy in that region is the worse nightmare of the USA.

    The Democratic Party will fall off the face of the earth and no one will notice.

    Poverty in the USA will continue to increase. Bush will continue to give speeches about how great the economy is doing.

    More US citizens will become expats and move to Costa Rica.

    Posted by rosemarie jackowski from  on  01/09  at  04:00 PM

  2. I don’t really have any predictions for 2006.  But I do have some resolutions that I would like to share.  Actually, my resolutions are the same ones that I have made for the past ten years.  If you were to see my list of resolutions for the last 10 years, you would see 10 copies of the same list in increasingly erratic handwriting. Every year I write them, never giving a second thought as to whether they are “me” or merely someone I wished I were. “Skydive, learn Aramaic, pillage.”

    Okay, I actually will make some predictions for ‘06. 

    - Republicans continue control of Congress.
    - I will not win the lottery. 
    - Harry Reid tells more lies in a hypocritically shrill and accusatory tone.

    Happy New Year All!

    Stevie C.

    Posted by Steve Canyon from The Chuck, WV  on  01/09  at  09:57 PM

  3. I predict that Israel will attack Iran,of course they will not use their own military machine(paid for by the US),why should they when they can waste the lives of the young Goyim in the US and UK.

    Posted by David Gray from United Kingdom  on  01/10  at  05:52 AM

  4. There’s a line between criticizing the state of Israel and being antisemitic, and you crossed it David. 
    You also raise a big misconception that Israel controls the US foreign policy, which is simply not true, because Israel is an aid net receiver.

    Giving weaponry and keeping Israel strong is in the strategic interests of US dominance of the region.  For one, it helps keep the US backed governments under control and democracy from spreading.

    Posted by Steve from US  on  01/10  at  09:31 PM

  5. I tell it as I see it Steve,I dont fear your labels using that device usually means that your argument cannot stand without a slur to help it along.
    I am not antisemitic I have nothing against semites as a whole I try not to be antijewish but they dont make it easy
    Some time ago Cherie Blair made a comment about the hoplessness of the youth of palistine. A few weeks later the British media,or should I say the media in Britian as there is little British about it attacked her, they made something out of nothing and used it to vilify her they called her mad,stupid and ugly it went on for weeks and was the most disgusting display of alliegiance to a foriegn power by a national media I have ever seen.
    Given that jewish influence over the media in the US is even worse then it is here how long do you think it would take to ruin Bush an ex alcoholic cocaine addict if he did not toe the line? add that to the clout the jews have on capitol hill and finally the people around the president, one is a known Israeli spy!! and tell me again that Israel does not write US foreign polcy.You are correct Israel is a net aid receiver(equal to $64,000 for every family in the US and rising)but why you should think this helps your point is a logic known only to you.
    Say what you see without fear,the king has no clothes!!!

    Posted by David Gray from United Kingdom  on  01/11  at  06:12 AM

  6. David,
    you sound like a typical neo-nazi, trying to be on the side of the left yet holding contempt for a whole group of people that’s not like you, in this case the Jews.

    YOu’re hurting the cause and your fascination with Jewish control belongs on nazi boards.  Mind you, the British media - BBC - is a government entity. 

    When I said that Israel is a net aid receiver, I meant that the US govt has an interest in promoting this policy - read my other comment.

    Posted by Steve from US  on  01/11  at  07:05 PM

  7. There you go with the labels again Steve answer the arguments and drop the slurs or the debate is pointless.
    I see that you have ideas and thoughts, elaborate

    Posted by David Gray from United Kingdom  on  01/11  at  09:11 PM
    8. Commenting is not available in this weblog entry. {/if}

    Next entry: MoveOn.org Surrenders: Silence is Complicity

    Previous entry: Citizen's Arrest: In Pursuit of Accountability in U.S. Foreign Policy

    [ads]

    Support Press Action