Wednesday, November 24, 2004
Liberals and Bush’s Performatives
By
Rosa Faiz
Add a Comment
-
Colon Bowell, the useful uncle Tom. If only He and Hilary would run for president in 2008 as a team for the Republicrats our worries would be over ( a black and a woman in office, look how liberal we are)! And then we have Bill Maher on Larry King live the other evening carping about how fundamentalist right wing Christians are the virus that have infected US politics by using Bush as a vector. True enough. But not a word about how the Zionists have had an erosive effect on US media and political discourse. Haim Saban, the right wing Zionist media mogul just purchased a large stake in the Brookings Institute (a nominally liberal think tank, or a useful Zio mouthpiece) in order to further promote the Israel-first agenda. Of course, Bill Maher couldn’t mention this since he might be arrested for being a terrorist according to a new “hate speech” bill that I believe was passed by the congress. The bill deems anyone who criticizes Israel as being a terrorist, or something like that. Of course, Bill also believes that Osama is our enemy when in fact he is a CIA asset. Bill made some good points though as well.
Posted by Rhino Rick from on 11/25 at 04:43 AM -
So the main point of your article is that you hate having to deal with all those idiots who don’t already share all of your progressive views?
And who is it that’s going to convince them to share your progressive views? Certainly not you. If even a fraction of your anger and condescension comes through to them, they certainly won’t change.
Progressives need to do outreach. You and this web page are actually HARMING progressive causes by airing such sarcasm and smug condescension.
Mr. Rhino Rick’s comment, bashing Christians and Zionists and calling people childish names (Colon Bowel) is just as bad if not worse. What’s the point of airing these comments? Are you hoping that things will improve because you spew out such stuff? And don’t tell me it’s true. It doesn’t matter whether it’s true. The point is that you harming the causes that you supposedly value.
Posted by Respectfully yours from here on 12/01 at 03:02 AM -
Harming what cause? The “progressive” cause that hijacked the antiwar movement and carried out a dispicable smear campaign against Nader so that “progressives” would vote for Kerry, the baby killer war criminal? As for bashing Christians and Zionists, you may call it bashing but these are merely empirical observations: Haim Saban is a big media mogul and he is a good good friend of Adolf Sharon. It is also well known that one of the reasons the Christian-Zionists support Bush is due to their religious beliefs. Is citing a law that the right wing Jewish lobby which is attempting (quite successfully) to forbid free speech (in order to protect the racist apartheid state from valid criticism) “bashing” or a topic worthy of debate?
Posted by Rhino Rick from on 12/01 at 07:30 AM
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
{/if}
Comments:
You must register to comment.
Login | Register
Next entry: DO NOT Support 'Our' Troops: The Toxicity of Center-Rightists, Liberals, and the Establishment Left
Previous entry: Press Action Submissions and Comment Policy
[ads]
Support Press Action




